In the same scenario, what action did the RA take to address the workload concern?

• A. Negotiated an extension with the manager
• B. Waited for midterms to pass
• C. Reduced the event scope
• D. Delegated planning to peer staff

Answer: (A)

When workload increases, the most effective move is to bring the supervisor into the conversation to adjust timelines and resources. In this scenario, the RA addressed the concern by negotiating an extension with the manager. This directly tackles feasibility by changing the deadline to a realistic due date, which helps maintain quality, reduces stress, and shows responsibility and collaboration. It signals to the manager that the RA is proactive and wants to deliver solid results rather than rush through tasks.

Other options either postpone action or shift the burden without proper alignment. Waiting for midterms to pass leaves the workload unresolved and risks deadlines slipping. Reducing the event scope eases pressure but sacrifices outcomes and may not be feasible or fair if the scope change wasn’t approved. Delegating planning to peer staff can help, but without manager buy-in and a clear plan, it may not fully resolve the timing and resource constraints.